I really can't believe it. How can a simple paw shape (like the one all Photoshop user have in their presets folder!!) cause such trouble. How can JW claim that such a (handcrafted) paw on a pillow is already a copyright infringement?
Does that mean when I paint my cat's paws and print them on a piece of fabric and sell it I must be afraid of that company? I have so much to say, but I better shut up.
I would understand if there are thousands of copies of THEIR ORIGINAL LOGO (which actually isn't very creative), but that is too much. Freedom for our animals paws!
Read the article at Spiegel here
No comments:
Post a Comment